Request a free Florida website accessibility scan for common automated barriers. Get a plain-English summary; not a full manual audit or legal opinion.
Request a free automated accessibility scan of selected website pages. It checks detectable patterns that may create barriers and returns a plain-English summary for follow-up; it is not an instant result, full manual audit, legal opinion, compliance score, or guarantee.
The free request starts an automated review of selected public pages, not an instant browser result. It looks for detectable issues involving image alternatives, headings, labels, links, color contrast, document links, motion controls, and signs of an accessibility overlay. We also flag areas that need human follow-up, such as keyboard navigation, phone menus, PDF menus, ordering or booking links, and how a screen reader announces a task. Automated tools cannot reliably determine whether every description is meaningful, whether a full transaction works, or whether a person using assistive technology can complete each journey. The summary therefore identifies detected patterns and review priorities rather than issuing a pass, certification, legal conclusion, or “compliance score.” A complete assessment requires manual keyboard and screen-reader testing, visual review, document inspection, and testing of important third-party flows. If you have received a demand letter, share it with qualified counsel and tell us so the technical review can address the cited items.
The scan is not a full manual accessibility audit, a legal opinion, a certification, proof of ADA or WCAG compliance, or a promise that every barrier will be detected. A detected issue is a review signal, not a prediction that a claim will occur. An undetected issue is not proof that a page is accessible. Learn about documented website accessibility remediation, read WCAG 2.1 AA for business owners, or contact JubilantWeb for a scoped assessment.
Yes. There is no charge to request the initial automated scan and plain-English summary. It reviews selected public pages rather than every page or transaction. Manual auditing, remediation, document work, and monitoring are separate services that require an agreed scope and price; requesting the scan does not obligate you to purchase them.
No. JubilantWeb’s published Privacy Policy states that personal information is not sold. We use the contact details you submit to process and respond to the scan request and for related service communications. Review the Privacy Policy for collection, disclosure, retention, and rights information before submitting the form.
If a summary groups findings by priority or risk, that label helps organize detected technical barriers and the importance of manual follow-up. It is not a legal conclusion, litigation prediction, or measure of a person’s claim. Context, affected tasks, page traffic, and manual testing all matter when deciding what to repair first.
A single score can imply certainty that automation cannot provide. Automated rules detect only some accessibility problems and cannot judge every user journey, text alternative, document, or third-party flow. We report specific detected findings and limits instead, then recommend manual keyboard, screen-reader, visual, and content review where a reliable conclusion requires it.
We can request-test public pages on many hosted platforms, including Wix, Squarespace, and Shopify. Toast ordering and other third-party tools may sit on a separate platform or domain, so access and remediation options differ. The summary can flag links or detectable barriers, but meaningful transaction testing may require a separately scoped manual review.
Automated scanning is useful but incomplete. It can consistently detect certain code patterns, while many issues require human judgment or interaction. Accuracy also depends on which pages are public and tested. The scan should be treated as an initial technical signal, not proof that a site passes WCAG, satisfies the ADA, or contains no barriers.